Clarence Mitchell - "There was no evidence of a break-in"

Initially, the McCanns CLAIMED that their apartment was LOCKED and that an abductor had broken into the apartment and damaged the shutters when they were jemmied open. The McCanns had phoned their family and friends to give their version of events and told them to spread the word to all and sundry. Newspapers, radio and television picked up these reports and therefore broadcast them as if they were factual reports. However, there was NO VISIBLE SIGNS of a break-in according to John Hill who was the Mark Warner complex manager. There was NO EVIDENCE, according to the police and the PJ, of any break-in. Much later, even Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns media spokesman, confirmed to the world that there was NO EVIDENCE of a break-in.

McCanns CHANGED story because SHUTTERS were NOT 'jemmied'! (Video)

However, the McCanns have never made any public statement why they LIED about a break-in. It has to be said, it is plausible that the McCanns LIED to cover up their own INVOLVEMENT in the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine.

It is plausible that at 10:00pm, before she raised the alarm, Kate McCann OPENED the apartment window. It had been cleaned the day before. Kate was asked whether she had touched the window, she claimed that she had not. However, only KATE'S FINGERPRINTS had showed up on the window during the PJ fingerprint testing. 

Portuguese police files/ Fingerprints

Once again, the McCanns have yet to provide an explanation to refute this evidence against them. Not only is there NO EVIDENCE OF A BREAK-IN, there is evidence against the McCanns that they have LIED TWICE in relation to the break-in and setting the scene to look like someone had broken in.. It must be plausible that the McCanns are involved in the disappearance of Madeleine, and their attempts to blame someone else is suspicious to say the least.

One of the most disturbing things about this case i've found, is the way the McCanns kept changing their STORIES of how the event that FATEFUL night unfolded. When the break-in version started to crumble, the McCanns then CLAIMED they had left the apartment UNLOCKED. So instead of an abductor breaking in to the apartment, he simply walked in through the UNLOCKED patio doors and supposedly CLIMBED out of the WINDOW! Surely it would have made more sense to WALK OUT the SAME WAY? But, there also needs to be an explanation for the OPENED WINDOW. It is plausible that the McCanns were DESPERATE to keep ahold of the ABDUCTION THEORY and ADAPTED it later to fit in with the police findings. In my opinion, once the break-in story was REJECTED the ABDUCTOR story should also have been REJECTED, then this would have left the McCanns with NO EXPLANATION for the disappearance of Madeleine.