Saturday, 8 April 2017

Tapas Refusals

David and Fiona Payne,

Matthew and Rachael Oldfield

Russell O’Brien and Jane Tanner




We have seen the absolute reluctance of the tapas group, those who holidayed with the McCann couple to assist police with a reconstruction of events of the night Madeleine vanished without trace.

The Portuguese Police answered all the questions put to them by this group, the questions which they said they needed to have answered before they would consider returning to Portugal.  They were given the re-assurances also which they asked for from the police as far as was possible.

The police could not however guarantee the group that the arguido status of Kate Healy McCann and Gerald McCann would be lifted - this was one of their demands.

It is obvious that they feared returning to Portugal.  

They invented all sorts of excuses for not doing so, and IN so doing, they accused the Portuguese Police of wanting them back in Portugal so that they could deem the group ‘suspects’ in the disappearance of Madeleine.  Saying, also, that the police in Portugal simply wanted to FIND HOLES in their stories!  That the police wanted to create inconsistencies in their stories!  That the police wanted to create problems for them!

Added to which they each stated that they saw no need for a reconstruction, saw no benefit of a reconstruction, they said it was too late in the day, that it should have been done sooner, it was at the wrong time of the year, too close to the 'first Anniversary' of Madeleine’s disappearance. 

On, and on the excuses rolled off their tongues.  The weather would be a problem to them. The press would be a problem to them.  People, locals might film them and then release the material.  It might be dark if it was a cloudy day when the reconstruction was filmed.  It would be upsetting for them.  

Wakey, wakey, anyone in this group remember the victim in this tragic case, a little girl, Madeleine,  who we are constantly told is alive and unharmed, being held captive possibly by a paedophile gang according to her parents - how 'upset' to put it mildly she might be?   The wee girl who unlike this bunch doesn't have a say a choice in where goes, what happens to her, and who DIDN'T have any choice on the night she vanished, her PARENTS deciding it was BEST for her and her brother and sister to spend EVERY evening on their OWN in a dangerous situation, in the dark, scary and unfamiliar unlocked holiday apartment?

Each of this group continually stated that they were NOT refusing, that they would do ALL in their power to help.  That they wanted to help! 

Sadly for Madeleine they NEVER DID!

What stands out in all of their statements is they claim that IF the reconstruction was filmed for the purpose of being televised for public viewing, an appeal for information that would help find Madeleine, they would THEN have been happy to return.  They could see a benefit in that.

The irony?  The police were APPEALING to THEM to return to Portugal to provide information crucial to the investigation information which by taking part in a reconstruction of events would HELP MADELEINE would help police ascertain what could have happened that evening, at WHAT TIME it was possible for any would-be intruder to have struck, to establish how this alleged intruder gained access to the apartment and how he made his escape.  Quite baffling that the group could not see the benefit - Or, was it simply a case of another excuse not to return, for reasons best known to them, but I am sure obvious to most!

This notion they have also which they spout that ONLY a reconstruction produced for television would be helpful to Madeleine, in finding her, in discovering what happened to her is quite ridiculous.

Just as it is  ridiculous for them to say, as they do, that if someone says the little girl is most likely to be dead, that this would prevent the public from reporting to police any information that may come to their attention.

Madeleine may be dead.   Most likely the child is, taking into account where the information collected by the investigation points.  But surely, that is not a reason for the group to not want to assist?  Surely discovering who harmed the child, who removed her from the apartment, discovering if possible where are her remains so that she may be laid to rest is equally as important to the McCanns, and the others in the holiday group?

Sadly it seems not.    The McCanns, and their friends are okay with asking the public to help Madeleine, asking the public to donate to their Fund, but when it comes to them assisting police – a quite different story - they are not so forthcoming, not the group as a whole, nor the child's mother Kate McCann, who refused to answer when questioned by police!

And one must ask - Has the Fund helped the child?

Six years on, and £m's of Fund money spent, (almost £1m lost to dodgy detective agencies) vast sums spent on legal actions raised by the McCann couple which they have failed to win in particular against a retired Portuguese Police Officer in their attempts to silence him.

One must ask also - How much in £'s has gone directly to help Madeleine and in what way? As thus far it would appear their extremely costly, private investigation funded in part by publicly donated monies, which they have quite literally bragged about for the past 6 years, has not come up with a scrap of evidence to support their abduction theory. 

Their private detectives have failed not only in finding any clue, but failed to produce even a theory as to how Madeleine was abducted.

We do of course have the McCanns story of abduction, but that quite frankly, is all that it is, their version. 

It is not a version backed by police, by evidence, or by anyone else.   Simply the story they released and for some extraordinary reason in some quarters it was accepted without challenge.   Yet, they have told tales of jemmied windows which were proved by forensics not to be true.  We have had Clarence Mitchell shape stories for the press, of 'sightings' among other far fetched tales, as part of their campaign.   They have made claims that they are investigating leads which the Portuguese police failed to act on, ONLY this too was not true.   On their Website we have still a picture of an individual they claim has not been identified.   This is a claim they have made re several people and again it was not true, people who were checked out and cleared by Portuguese police.   And we have stories of 'checking the children' which absolutely do not add up.  WHY?

We have also on their website a claim, 'a criminal style reconstruction' for those visiting to view.

The McCanns did NOT make a criminal style reconstruction of events of the night Madeleine vanished.   They put together a little drama which by no stretch of the imagination could be referred to, or considered as a criminal style reconstruction.  
Key witnesses  not being allowed to take up the positions where they were on the night Madeleine vanished! Tanner's 'man' being portrayed as one and the same man that the Smith family saw?  He was shown to be carrying the child in the same manner as in the Tanner sighting, which of course the McCanns who made this drama KNEW was not a truthful re-enactment.   And much more misleading information was contained therein.   But we must not forget their site is McCann World, and there it seems, 'anything is possible.' 

Rubber wrist bands, on sale too, good quality, no less, so they say, t-shirts, holiday packs, no doubt lying gathering dust, not best sellers I would imagine, as not exactly what our children need as we set off to the sun -  a reminder that little kids disappear on holiday, left alone at night in dark apartments by their parents 

Altogether a rather cheap and tacky site in my view - it is not what one expects when a little girl is missing - this money making scheme.

Money though is NOT the answer to solving the crimes against this child, nor is hiring dodgy private detective agencies.

The public donating have a right to know that the monies are being used wisely, and for proper purpose.  They have a right to know when vast sums are lost to fraudsters, fraudsters who the McCann Team  declared were doing a 'GOOD JOB, that the McCanns were pleased with his efforts.  

How can that be?

The key witnesses, the McCanns and their friends without a doubt hold the answer to what happened to Madeleine.   Kate McCann says of others - 'they might not know that they hold a piece of information.'   

Then arguably the same applies to this group of people, the McCann group, that they don't know that they hold vital information?    Though their 'refusals' tell another story!

Such a pity the Portuguese Police could not have called ‘their bluff’ on this one, as there is NO WAY these people were returning to Portugal under any circumstances.

You see, whether the reconstruction was filmed/recorded, be it for police internal investigative use only or for the purpose of a televised appeal for information, the VERY SAME problems and excuses they spoke of would still have existed.

They would still have thought the Portuguese police wanted to:


Find holes in their stories.
Cause them problems.
Create problems and inconsistencies in their stories.
Make them suspects – 'slap arguido status on them' as Tanner said.
The press, the locals filming it, and all of the other  quite ridiculous excuses they invented to avoid going.
The weather, the storm clouds, the darkness, the time of year, the closeness to the 1st Anniversary would still all have been the same.
Kate Healy McCann and Gerald McCann would still have been arguido as the police said they could not guarantee this would change before any reconstruction.

They claimed a reconstruction at this time would have been too little, too late.  Only one way to find out - to test it!

So for this group of people, the McCanns included to say they would have taken part in a reconstruction if it was for the purpose of an appeal is utter nonsense.

Their same fears/excuses would still have existed.   Their fear of returning to Portugal of having to speak with police.

These people it is clear for all to see on reading the statements given by them, the refusals, were afraid to return and I can only think that this was because they KNEW absolutely that their statements did not add up.  That a reconstruction would throw up the the flaws in their story.   

Flaws which Matthew Oldfield very calculatingly stated the Portuguese Police would create if they, the tapas group stepped once more on Portuguese soil.   The police cannot 'create' inconsistencies, they either exist in the tales told by the group in their statements to police, or they do not.  

But how very devious of Oldfield, of them all, to attempt to shift blame by once more spreading a tale, and again not one of truth, to blacken the Portuguese Police by suggesting they would create inconsistencies problems for the group.

The flaws, the inconsistencies the untruths in their police witness statements are ALL of their  OWN making.   Their problems of their own creation when they set out to deceive.


Six years ago this group of people dug a hole, and they haven't stopped digging since!


Madeleine, finding her, helping her, discovering what happened on that fateful night – furthest from their minds!

O’Brien?  Sickeningly gushing in his correspondence to Leicestershire police in defence, of the McCanns who he barely knew!  Now why would that be?


"We are very keen to help an investigation aiming to establish what's happened to Madeleine, but have no desire to assist one that seeks only to damn our innocent friends."


How does O'Brien know if his "friends" are innocent? 
How do we know if O'Brien is innocent?
How can we believe him?

This is the man who stated to police, that he took the keys of both the McCann apartment and the Oldfield apartment  on the Sunday evening, entered both properties and checked on the Oldfield child and the McCann children.

Oh dear - HE WAS LYING!


EVERYTHING about their actions sets alarm bells ringing!  None more so than the REFUSALS and what the REAL REASONS behind them!

The next pages detail the correspondence sent by the individual group members to Leicestershire police, as ‘middleman’ between the group and the Portuguese police.  An interesting read!

Details of all correspondence between the group, Leicestershire Police and Portuguese Police, PJ can be found on the McCannfiles:

The Cancelled Reconstruction

A thank you, to Nige at the McCannfiles, his site is a marvellous source of reference from where I obtained the information on rogatory interviews/the communications between group and police.


l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
April 2013


Graphic: Madeleine McCann Know The Truth


Mccann's Express News: "Now Hunt Centres on Disused Barn"

by Joana Morais---9 years ago







Sunday Newspaper Front Pages Sunday December 02, 2007 The Sunday Express leads with a picture of missing toddler Madeleine McCann. It claims DNA clues have been found at a deserted farmhouse.






"Now Hunt Centres on Disused Barn"

The hunt for Madeleine McCann last night centred on a disused barn near Praia da Luz where police found a towel stained with what may turn out to be the little girl's blood.
Fibres found on the towel allegedly match fibres from the hire car rented by Maddie's parents, Kate and Gerry McCann.

Portuguese detectives discussed the breakthrough when they met British police and a Crown Prosecution Service official last week at a police station in Leicester.

Today, for the first time the Sunday Express can shed light on the new avenue police are pursuing 


in the hope of a breakthrough in the baffling case. 
Based on fresh information from mobile phone surveillance, police began a search of an area in the south east of the resort. They came across a towel, with an Aztec design, near a disused barn in a remote area close to Praia da Luz.

Portuguese sources say forensic scientists used a substance called Luminol to look for blood deposits and found three sites on the edges of the towel. They tested the blood deposits to see if there was a match with Madeleine's DNA.

Although the samples were not good quality the scientists were able to do what is called low copy analysis, which showed there was "moderate” support to suggest the blood deposits matched Madeleine's blood.

The results were not conclusive and are not regarded as being strong enough to be presented as evidence in any court case.

They also found a loaf and a carrier bag, which produced no significant information, but close analysis of the towel revealed fibres which were not made of the towel material. The fibre fragments were microscopically examined against fibres found in the boot of the Renault Scenic hired by the McCanns 25 days after Maddie vanished.
Portuguese police sources say there was "strong support" that the fibres found on the towel matched fibres from the boot of the car.

One possibility being considered by the Portuguese detectives was that the towel had at some point been in the boot of the Renault Scenic, which would explain how fibres had got on it.

Saturday December 1,2007

PERMISSION NEEDED TO QUIZ MCCANNS

Portuguese police would need the permission of the Home Secretary if they wanted to re-interview Kate and Gerry McCann or their friends on British soil, a police source said. There have been reports that the McCanns could be re-interviewed by Portuguese officers or detectives from Leicestershire Police in connection with the disappearance of their four-year-old daughter Madeleine from their holiday apartment in the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz. Detectives in Portugal also reportedly want to question members of the so-called Tapas Seven - friends of Kate and Gerry who were dining with them on May 3 shortly before Madeleine vanished. But any request would have to go through Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, police sources in the UK said. The source said: "All I can tell you is the procedure by which Leicestershire Police and the McCanns would have to go through. "A request would have to be sent to the Home Office in writing and would have to be approved by the Home Secretary."A spokeswoman for the Home Office said: "If the Portuguese police were to require to travel to the UK then they would need to apply for mutual legal assistance from the Home Office."


Saturday December 1,2007
GERRY AND KATE ‘STILL PRIME SUSPECTS’

Kate and Gerry McCann are still regarded as the prime suspects in the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine despite inconclusive findings from DNA evidence. Portuguese police will come to Britain next week to re-interview the seven friends who were dining with the couple on the night the little girl vanished, a highly placed source claimed yesterday. It shatters the couple’s hopes that they will be cleared by Christmas. Investigators say that while findings revealed at a DNA summit this week did not give them enough evidence to bring charges, they do provide the legal basis to demand further interviews of the McCanns’ friends and relatives on British soil. Leaks in Portugal claim tests on DNA samples support Portuguese detectives’ theory that the couple were involved in Madeleine’s disappearance. Portuguese daily newspaper 24 Horas reported that a police source said: “The existing evidence up until now is far from clearing the McCann couple in the case. “There are more and more indicators that they were involved in the disappearance of the child, but it has been difficult to prove this fact. We will continue to follow all hypotheses.”


Friday November 30,2007
BID TO CLEAR MCCANNS AFTER DNA TRIP

Kate and Gerry McCann's spokesman has declared "enough is enough" as he called on Portuguese police to clear the couple over their missing daughter Madeleine. Four members of the Portuguese investigation team are due to fly home from the UK on Friday after a meeting with British forensic experts to discuss DNA samples collected for the inquiry into the missing four-year-old. Family spokesman Clarence Mitchell told reporters: "Enough is enough. There can be nothing that incriminates Kate and Gerry because they are innocent. We are hopeful this meeting will help speed up the process eliminating Kate and Gerry from the inquiry. "They just want the injustice of being suspects to end and the real job of finding Madeleine to resume in earnest."We hope that following this meeting the Portuguese prosecutor will let common sense prevail and will lift their arguido status."Forensic evidence, if there is any, is inconclusive or explicable, so they should be eliminated from the inquiry."The Portuguese team met five experts from the FSS to consider DNA results from tests the organisation has been conducting on behalf of the authorities in Portugal over the last four months.The tests are said to have been carried out on blood samples, bodily fluids and hair found in the McCanns' holiday apartment and the vehicle they hired 25 days after the four-year-old disappeared.






The McCanns had claimed the Supreme Courts decision was 'frivolous' like past appeals, only this being a petty 'complaint' it was also destined for the shredder


McCanns Supreme Court annulment request Thursday16th February, 2017



Supreme Court Of Justice



Section 1

Case No. 1.454 / 09.5TVLSB.L1.S1



Your Excellency Doctor Judge Counselor Rapporteur,



KATE MARIE HEALY MCCANN and GERALD PATRICK MCCANN, appellants identified in the case minutes, having been notified of the entire content of the STJ 1st Section's ruling, which redounded on the matter of the appeal for review, come, under the terms and for the purposes of the provisions of articles 615-1(b, c) and 4-1 and 666 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (1) to argue for the assembly the

NULLITY OF THE RULING

What they do, on the following grounds:

The factual assumptions - which are supposed to be valid - of the logical argumentation set out in the ruling now object of complaint contradict and constitute a sense of reason opposite to that which is inferred from the factual ground of the decision,


Note-1: Article 615 – Causes of Nullity of the Sentence 

1 – The sentence is null when : 

b) It does not specify the factual and legal grounds that justify the decision. 

c) The grounds are in opposition to the decision or there is some ambiguity or obscurity that turns the decision unintelligible. 

4 - The nullities mentioned in points b) to e) of paragraph 1 can only be argued before the court that delivered the sentence if this one does not admit ordinary appeal, and if it does the appeal can be based on any of these nullities. 

(there is no 615-4,1) 

Article 666 - Vices and Reform of the Ruling 

1 - The provisions of articles 613 to 617 are applicable to the 2nd instance, but the ruling is still null and void when it is drawn against the unsuccessful party or without the necessary salary. 

2 - The rectification or amendment of the judgment, as well as the plea of nullity, shall be decided in a conference. 

(pertinence of 666-1 ?)



Page 02

And this in particular as regards the conclusive epitome on the protection of the rights of the appellants to their good name and reputation, and their intimate relationship with the presumption of innocence or, if we wish to be more rigorous, the status of innocence that they enjoy.
Now,
It is established in the minutes, under point 15 of the factual matter, that, in particular :

(...)

"It appears that the non involvement of the parents, arguidos (formal suspects), in any penally relevant action stems from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when Madeleine disappeared, from the normal behaviour that they displayed until said disappearance and afterwards, as can be amply concluded from witness statements, from the telephone communications analysis and also from the forensics' conclusions, namely the reports from the (Birmingham) Forensic Science Service (FSS) and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine.

 To this should be added that in fact none of the clues that led to their constitution as “arguidos" was later confirmed or consolidated.



Page 03

Let's judge it : the information concerning a previous alert of the media before the police was not confirmed, the residues that were marked by the dogs were not corroborated in laboratory, and the initial indications from the above transcribed email (2) better examined afterwards, that ended up appearing to be inconclusive.

(...)

Tests and analyses were performed in two of the most prestigious and credentialed institutions - the National Institute for Legal Medicine and the British Forensic Science Service -, their final results having neither positively evaluated the collected residues nor corroborated the dogs' alerts.

(...) (3)

it was not possible to obtain any evidence that would allow for a average man, enlightened by criteria of logics, of norms and of the general rules of experience, 


Note-2: The email on the preliminary DNA analysis by the FSS of the samples collected in the car hired by the Mcs.

Note-3 : (...) is substituted to "In spite of all this" in the original document (the filing order)



Page 04

to formulate any lucid, sensate, serious and honest conclusion about the circumstances under which the child was removed from the apartment (whether dead or alive, whether killed in a neglectful homicide or an intended homicide, whether the victim of a targeted or opportunistic abduction), nor even to produce a consistent prognosis about her destiny and inclusively – and that's the most dramatic - to establish whether she is still alive or, as it seems the more likely, she is dead.

(...)

Therefore, everything having been examined, analysed and duly pondered, considering what is left exposed, we determine

(...)

the archiving of the autos concerning the (by lawyer) assisted witnesses Gerald Patrick McCann and Kate Marie Healy, due to the lack of clues of their practising any crime” (cf. Also, alinea AQ) of the established facts in the normalizing dispatch of the process).



The documentary proof that supported the determination of this fact as proved, even in the condensation phase of the proceedings, is, as a result, the order to file the aforementioned criminal investigation, together with the minutes on paper or in digital form.



Page 05

In the operative part of this order, one can read, immediately after the sentence "because there is no evidence that they have committed any crime", the express mention of article 277-1 of the CPP (Code of Penal Procedure) (4), through the concrete expression "in accordance with the provisions of article 277-1 of the CPP".

In the light of this, it seems to the appellants that this STJ's Section can not lightly come to say in the ruling now matter of complaint, necessarily without falling (5) into a conspicuous contradiction of grounds, that the archival in question "was determined since it had not been possible for the Public Ministry to obtain sufficient evidence of the commission of crimes by the appellants (cf. quoted article 277-2)" (6).

Just as (this STJ's Section) could not assert that it is not acceptable to assimilate the aforementioned filing order to a verified proof of innocence, precisely because the order to which that court refers,



Note-4    Article 277 - Archiving of the investigation 

1 - The Public Ministry shall, by dispatch, close the investigation, as soon as it has gathered sufficient evidence that the crime was not confirmed, that the arguido did not practice it in any way or that the procedure is legally inadmissible

   
Note-5
this is a literal translation, but the appropriate syntax for what is meant is "sem necessariamente cair...", i.e without falling necessarily...

   
Note-6
Article 277 - Archiving of the investigation 

2. The investigation shall also be closed if it had not been possible for the Public Ministry to obtain sufficient evidence confirming the crime or who were the authors.



Page 06

as a presupposition of the conclusion it reached, does not unexist (7) uttered under article 277-2 of the CPP.

As far as the appellants are aware of, the archiving at stake was carried out, in the course of the investigation, because sufficient proof had been gathered that the then arguidos did not commit any facts of a criminal relevance and in any way whatsoever, this conclusion substantiating an archiving for factual reasons,

A point that should have always meant inside the decision taken by this STJ that, in this investigation, exists the necessary certainty that the persons then arguidos did not participate objectively, subjectively and individually in its (8) practice, whether as perpetrators or only as accomplices.

On the other hand,


Note-7
read “exists”.  La Bruyère wrote that "Whatever we conceive well we express clearly, and words flow with ease”. It seems that here things aren’t as well conceived as they should to be understandable. Double negations are traps even for grammarians. As well read "could not assert that it is not acceptable” as “could not assert that it is unthinkable”


Note-8 this possessive adjective lacks syntaxic representation. One can guess that it refers to the undetermined crime MMC was victim of.



Page 07

Furthermore the appellants find that the conclusion reached in the ruling under complaint is lacking factual ground concerning the fact that the alluded filing decision is liable to be amended by various means, which is done with a view to removing from the minutes the application of the presumption of innocence principle.

However, the archiving decision, which is proven in the minutes, produces important preclusive legal effects, which are protected by the procedural law, having the force of res judicata, as, moreover, is foreseen in the schemes established by articles 279-1, 282-3 and 449-2 of the CPP. (9)



That is to say, therefore, that the filing order uttered according to article 277-1 of the CPP, after the deadline of article 278 (10) of the same legal compendium, is res judicata and is only subject to review according to the terms of articles 279 and 449-2 of the CPP.

That is to say, the invalidation of the grounds invoked by the Public Ministry's office in the filing order, made under the provisions of article 277-1 of the CPP, can only be based on new facts or elements of evidence unknown by the Public Ministry at the investigation’s time (11) and that, therefore,


Note-9
Article 279 - Reopening of the investigation

1. Once the period referred to in the previous article has expired, the investigation may be reopened only if new evidence appears to invalidate the grounds invoked by the Public Ministry in the filing order. 

Article 282 - Duration and effects of suspension

3 - If the arguido complies with the injunctions and rules of behaviour, the Public Ministry closes the processes that cannot be reopened. 

Article 449 - Reasons and admissibility of the review

2 - For the purpose of the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the dispatch terminating the process shall be equated with the sentence (made res judicata).


Note-10
Article 278 - Hierarchical intervention

1 - Within a period of 20 days from the date on which the opening of the investigation can no longer be requested, the immediate superior of the Public Ministry magistrate may, on his own initiative or at the request of the assistant or of the complainant capable of being constituted assistant, determine that an indictment is made or that the investigations continue, indicating, in this case, the steps to be taken and the deadline for compliance.

2 - The assistant and the complainant able to become an assistant may, if they choose not to request the opening of the instruction, raise the hierarchical intervention, under the previous number, within the period provided for that request.


Note-11
Read “only new pertinent elements will be able to cast doubt upon the grounds invoked by the PM".



Page 08

could not be presented and produced in order to be assessed and pondered in the decision.

However, inside the factual matter established as proved in the minutes, there is no fact capable of constituting ground for the review or reopening of the investigation in question, there is thus no basis for the finding advanced by the court to the effect that the principle of innocence isn’t able to be alluded to in the minutes to restrict the right to  freedom of expression, because of the, erroneous, starting assumption that the archiving of the criminal investigation "was determined by the fact that the PM had not been able to obtain sufficient evidence of the commission of crimes by the appellants". (12)

Therefore,

we request that Your Excellencies deign : (13)

a) to hear the present nullity imputation,

b) to remedy the flaws of inconsistency between the factual basis and the conclusions reached in the ruling and the flaws of failure of ground, as stated above, 


Note-12
The complexity of the filing order, erroneously known as the “AG Report”, is likely related to the difficult task the Public Ministry was facing. And one has to admit that the dispatch is not written as the judges of the STJ remarkably write their rulings. Mr Murat’s arguido status, twice extended, required to put an end to the criminal investigation (the status of arguidos can’t be removed before the end of that investigation phase).

 Furthermore the acquaintances of the MCs rejected the request of the Prosecutor to go back to PDL in order to be part in a reconstitution of the 3rd of May events, though the Prosecutor clearly warned that it was the last chance for boosting the rather stagnant criminal investigation. These are the significant circumstances involving the writing of the filing order. One has to acknowledge an important point however : the Prosecutors foresaw that their constrained decision, as it couldn’t exonerate the MCs, the crime being undetermined, would reflect the “major damage done to the MCs” by the refusal of the group to collaborate with the PJ.

   
Note-13  Note that the complaint starts addressing to Your Excellency (singular)



Page 09

All with legal consequences. 

Attached is a document proving that justice fees were paid.

Notification concerning this complaint was sent to the opposite parties by email on 16.02.2017 (14)

Signature :  Dr Ricardo Correia Afonso


Note-14: This document was published on PJGA on March 18, but Gonçalo Amaral legal team is supposed to have been emailed it on February 16. The referred receipt of justice fees isn’t appended.


Pamalam