Wednesday 3 May 2017

How the discrediting of former top cop helps shut down damning Madeleine McCann theories

CRIME  2:02pm May 3, 2017


By  Mark Saunokonoko  





Crusading hero to many and vindictive villain to others, the figure of Goncalo Amaral is almost as much a part of the Madeleine McCann story as her parents, Kate and Gerry.

Amaral was the original supervising detective in the Maddie McCann case, an unsolved mystery which has captivated the world since Portuguese police were called at 10.41pm on May 3, 2007.

That first phone call, made some 41 minutes after Kate McCann claimed to have discovered Maddie was missing, sparked a 15-month police investigation that came under the most extraordinary media and political pressures.

Five months into the investigation, and following the naming of Kate and Gerry as suspects in the disappearance of their four-year-old daughter, Amaral found himself removed from the case.

However, Amaral sensationally reappeared just days after the Portuguese police investigation was eventually shelved in July 2008, with an explosive book that was hugely damaging to the McCanns.

His 22-chapter account, titled Truth of the Lie, concluded Maddie had probably died in some kind of accident inside holiday apartment 5A, that an abduction was staged and her tiny body had been disposed of by Kate and Gerry.

The McCanns launched an expensive and protracted legal battle, using money from the millions of dollars donated to the Find Madeleine Fund, to have Amaral's personal account of the investigation banned.

Initially the McCanns succeeded, before a 2016 court tossed that decision out and ruled that the injunction had violated Amaral's freedom of expression.

Throughout the investigation, and continuing to the present day, Amaral, now aged 57, has been continuously and methodically mauled by the British tabloids and to a lesser extent various UK broadsheets.

Amaral's supporters believe the ongoing assassination of his character and policing methods helps shape the perception that his theories must be wild and fanciful.

A man named Clarence Mitchell, a former British government media mastermind, has been the key strategist in the McCann's meticulous public relations campaign for each of the 10 years since Maddie vanished.

Over the past week, as the milestone tenth anniversary of Madeleine's approached, maneuverings to discredit Amaral were once again evident in the pages of the powerful and wide-reaching UK red tops.

Two high profile stories which ran this week in The Sun and The Mirror both painted Amaral as, there's no other way to say it, a kind of crackpot.

The first attributed quotes to Amaral about Maddie being secretly placed inside a coffin with a dead body which was later cremated; the second pushed Amaral's supposed belief that British spy agency MI5 had helped hide Maddie's body.

Amaral, in both instances, was selectively edited and his comments were twisted out of context.

The former cop has previously spoken about the cremated coffin and related police information about three figures seen entering a church in Praia da Luz carrying a bag.




In a 2016 interview on CMTV, he confirmed the McCanns were given keys to the local church, close to where the family was staying. Inside there was a coffin of an adult woman that was later incinerated.

During the TV appearance Amaral explained that all possible angles of a missing persons case should be explored by detectives.

"No one is saying that the parents did that [put Madeleine's body in the coffin]," he said.

The startling claim that spooks from MI5 helped hide Madeleine's body is another disturbing manipulation of the truth.

The facts are in the days following Maddie's disappearance the UK government made the remarkably unusual step of becoming closely involved in another sovereign nation's police investigation.

British police were sent to Portugal to assist, while the British ambassador to Portugal and other officials also arrived in Praia Da Luz within 48 hours of Madeleine being reported missing.




A former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan and ex Foreign Office civil servant, Craig Murray, publicly questioned "the exceptional treatment from British authorities" for the McCanns.

"British diplomatic staff were under direct instruction to support the McCanns far beyond the usual and to put pressure on the Portuguese authorities over the case," Murray wrote in an April, 2016 blog post.

"I have direct information that more than one of those diplomatic staff found the McCanns less than convincing and their stories inconsistent.

"Embassy staff were perturbed to be ordered that British authorities were to be present at every contact between the McCanns and Portuguese police."

There were criticisms that the Policia Judiciaria were leaking rumours and unsubstantiated facts of the case to Portuguese journalists, while starving the hungry British press corp.

Ian Woods, a Sky News reporter on the ground in Praia Da Luz, explained how that dynamic divided the British and Portuguese journalists, creating an 'us' and 'them' agenda.

"For the first few weeks or months the British media were largely pro-McCann and the Portuguese media seemed largely anti-McCann," Woods wrote in a 2009 study examining media coverage of the case.

As the days ticked over into weeks, and with no sign of Maddie's return, the British press began to attack the way the investigation was handled.

On reflection, Amaral has admitted the Portuguese investigation, inevitably, made mistakes.

One of his biggest regrets, he said, was not immediately putting surveillance traces on Kate and Gerry's phones.

Amaral also lamented the failure of police to immediately obtain the clothes Maddie had worn at the resort crèche on the day she disappeared.

The McCanns have not ruled out trying to again ban The Truth of the Lie by taking the legal fight with Amaral all the way to the European Court of Human Rights.

Meanwhile, rumours have circulated that Amaral is planning a second book.

Ten years on, Madeleine Beth McCann remains missing.




© Nine Digital Pty Ltd 2017







English Inspector refused to investigate Maddie's disappearance for being forced to ignore clues

Detective of the Metropolitan Police says that Scotland Yard wanted only to prove the innocence of the parents.


By Pedro Zagacho Gonçalves | 12:32



An English detective reveals that he refused to lead the investigation into Maddie's disappearance because Scotland Yard would order him to investigate only the abduction case, ignoring any other clues. VIDEOInspector refuses to investigate Maddie's disappearance Detective of the Metropolitan Police says that Scotland Yard wanted only to prove the innocence of the parents. 


Colin Sutton tells Sky News that a colleague of the London Metropolitan Police advised him to leave the investigation when Scotland Yard became involved in the process in 2010 about three years after the disappearance of the English girl in Praia da Luz . 

The detective explains that this source assured him that the only task they would be given would be to investigate the kidnapping thesis, clearing the parents of any responsibility in the case. 

"I got a call from a senior agent who told me that it was not a good idea to conduct this investigation, based on the fact that I would not be happy to lead it if you were telling me where to go and where not to go, what to investigate and Scotland Yard's investigation was going to be very focused on just one aspect, and that focus was on warding off any suspicions of the McCanns and the friends who were with them at the Tapas, "the detective says. 

Colin Sutton knows that the McCanns' friends were questioned by the Judiciary Police, but says that the investigation in Portugal has always worked on the idea that Madeleine McCann had been abducted. The English criticism of the "too narrow focus" action of the Portuguese and English authorities points out that other hypotheses should be put forward. "If you are reviewing an investigation that has already been done, you start again at the beginning. You see all the evidence again, you hear all the testimonies, you go through everything and analyze how everything fits together and how it compares."








Amaral breaks his silence

Posted by PORTUGALPRESS on May 03, 2017



Quiet since the country’s highest court absolved him - for the second time in eight years - of having to pay huge sums in damages to the parents of Madeleine McCann, Gonçalo Amaral, author of the book “Maddie: the Truth of the Lie” spectacularly broke his silence this week to journalists of the Cofina group.

In perfect synchronicity first Sábado weekly magazine set the scene with “The Return of the Inspector to the Scene of the Crime”. Then daily paper Correio da Manhã ran a Sunday special on “The dead end hiding Maddie McCann”, and finally daily news channel CMTV ran “Maddie the Enigma” - a bombshell by any other name, going on air at midnight on May 1, and ending with merciless analysis an hour later on May 2.

Merciless, that is for the ‘politically correct’ British version of how a three year old girl became the world’s most famous missing person on the night of May 3, 2007.

If anyone thought former PJ coordinator Gonçalo Amaral would be measuring his words after an eight year legal fight with Kate and Gerry McCann that saw him “financially asphyxiated” as the couple attempted to sue him for €1.2 million, they will be now be thinking again.

The 57-year-old is every bit as convinced of his thesis - that Madeleine died in a tragic accident in apartment 5a of Luz Ocean Club in Praia da Luz - as he ever was.

Admitting nonetheless that the Portuguese police made some key mistakes at the outset, Amaral took Cofina group journalists round the former Ocean Club complex, explaining minutely why statements and accounts given by “the British group” of friends accompanying the McCanns did not, in his opinion, stack up.

It was an hour of ‘no mercy’. No inconvenient detail excluded. The “servility to the British” and to “political pressures”, the almost instant arrival on the scene of the British ambassador and press hordes, the allusion to children sedated by Calpol, the presence of “the investigation’s most enigmatic figure”, McCann friend and fellow doctor David Payne - whose “fetish”, said Amaral, was to bathe the children of other friends - and the spine-chilling reactions of blood and cadaver dogs Eddie and Keela.

CMTV returned time and again to footage of Eddie howling the presence of cadaver odour in the McCann apartment and car - and even featured a clip of him honing in on clothes laid out in unassociated surroundings.

Amaral talked of the possibility of Madeleine’s body having been kept in the freezer of an apartment, and then transferred to the boot of the McCann’s hire car months later.

“We had information that they (the McCanns) went to an apartment near the cemetery on many nights,” he told his interviewers. “We tried to find out which apartment it was”, but by this time - almost six months into the investigation - PJ superiors were getting ready to remove Amaral from the case, to concentrate instead on the abduction theory. This rapidly led to the case being archived, due to the complete absence of any conclusive evidence.

Since then, criminal analysts Moita Flores and Carlos Anjos accept “millions have been spent perpetuating a lie”.

“From the very outset, the investigation was politically conditioned”, former PJ inspector Moita Flores told CMTV’s late-night crime analysis Rua Segura (Safe Street).

If any Britons were watching, this was the moment where the differences in opinion between England and Portugal hit home.

This is not simply the story of one former PJ inspector’s theory versus the protestations of two parents, backed by the might of the Met. This is the story of a nation that does not accept that children are plucked from their tourist beds in the middle of the night by child traffickers, pedophiles, or even ‘bungling burglars’.

As PJ deputy head Pedro do Carmo told the BBC this week: “We have never had any case like this, either before or since”.

His response to the question, “do you think in your heart it will ever be solved” was telling nonetheless. He said: “If it depended on my heart, the case would already be solved. But it doesn’t depend on my heart. It depends, very much, on our minds”.

Moita Flores and Carlos Anjos were adamant that Scotland Yard is “protecting criminals”, while Amaral simply returned to his mantra for resolution: a proper investigation, that follows all lines until they are exhausted - not one that allows only one way forwards at the expense of everything else.

Mistakes? They may not be the sort people were expecting.

“I should not have allowed us to be put under so much pressure”, Amaral told Correio da Manhã’s Sunday magazine, explaining that when the McCann family finally left Praia da Luz in September 2007, the British police who had come over to assist the Portuguese investigation also left - leaving the “sensation that they were only here to protect the couple”.

“We were naive and too diplomatic”, he added. The desire to please the British led investigators to send trace evidence for testing to a UK-based laboratory “so that we would not be accused of manipulation in the final result”.

But while Amaral ‘returned to Praia da Luz’ to give his view of the 10 year old mystery, the missing girl’s parents gave an interview to the BBC in which they insisted they will be appealing the Supreme Court decision that should have handed back the former police coordinator his assets and police pension after eight years in which he struggled to survive.

Gerry McCann explained that what he called “the last judgement” - the ruling that upheld Amaral’s right to freedom of expression, and refused to accept the McCann’s insistence that they had been proved innocent in their daughter’s disappearance - is, in his opinion, “terrible”.

“We will be appealing”, he told the national news service.

The Daily Express suggests the couple plan to appeal “all the way to the European Court of Human Rights”, though there is still no certainty that this can be done - particularly as Supreme Court judges Roque Nogueira, Alexandre Reis and Pedro Lima Gonçalves released their 75-page ruling making references to tenets set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

In other words, Amaral’s ‘win’ relied heavily on three judges’ interpretation of laws that the ECHR was set up to protect.

As for the former PJ coordinator, he sees the Supreme court decision as redemption: the sign that his thesis is a “credible lead”, and that the police force he once served will finally take it as the incentive to “once and for all start investigating”.

By coincidence, as we wrote this article, the Daily Mail released an account quoting detective Colin Sutton, once tipped to “head up the Madeleine McCann probe” initiated by the Met in 2011, and which has reportedly so far cost in excess of €14 million.

Sutton told Martin Brunt of Sky News that he was “warned” by a high ranking source not to take the job as he would be “tasked” with proving Kate and Gerry McCann “were innocent, and (into) ignoring any alternatives to the abduction theory”.


Portugal Press